CONTACT US
Drystone Chambers
35 Bedford Row
London
WC1R 4JH
DX: 332 London/Chancery Lane
CONTACT US
Drystone Chambers
35 Bedford Row
London
WC1R 4JH
DX: 332 London/Chancery Lane
Call 1978 | Silk 2003
Andrew Campbell-Tiech K.C.
Call 1978 | Silk 2003
No two cases are alike. No two courts are alike. Andrew Campbell-Tiech KC’s experience of the most demanding cases before the most demanding tribunals is a resource in itself and of real advantage to those he represents.
Andrew has defended in more than 50 murder trials. He has particular expertise in the areas of insanity and diminished responsibility and is consequently no admirer of the M’Naghton rules. He has similar expertise and reservations about overreach in joint enterprise cases, notwithstanding Jogee.
K: M’Naghton
Precluding defence of insanity for severely mentally ill patient who bore no responsibility for his acts.
S-M
Matricide by ex-psychiatric patient: diminished responsibility
C
Matricide & epilepsy: insanity
A & 5 Ors
Joint enterprise single knife wound
M & 6 Ors
Joint enterprise two knife wounds
L & 4 Ors
Joint enterprise one gunshot
Andrew has practised in this area for over twenty years and has appeared at first instance and at appellate level in many reported cases. He has written extensively about the excesses of the POCA scheme, notably as part of the editorial board of Criminal Law Week.
May [2008] 1 AC 1028
Meaning of ‘benefit’
Zinga [2014] 1 Cr.App.R 27
Confiscation & the private prosecutor
Kakkad [2015] 1 W.L.R 4162
Forfeiture orders and confiscation
Ali (Salah) [2015] 1 W.L.R 841
Confiscation in absentia
Kamyab [2021] 1 W.L.R 4860
Powers of the CACD to conduct confiscation proceedings; Panayi wrongly decided.
Re D
Inadequacy – s.23 application
Re T
Inadequacy – s.23 application
Re EL
Inadequacy: – s.23 application
Re JWW
Default sentence
Re EK
Default sentence
Re C
Bankruptcy, costs & inadequacy
Re W
Abuse of process & the decision to prosecute
Re K
Abuse of process & the decision to prosecute
As a barrister who has specialised in money laundering for many years, Andrew is regarded as a leading practitioner in this field.
He is the general editor of Butterworth’s Money Laundering Law.
He advises financial institutions and others, both as to compliance generally and particularly as to the reach of the Money Laundering Regulations
Andrew has defended in complex high-value fraud cases including banking, tax, insurance, construction and insolvency. Often coupled with allegations of money laundering and/or offences under the Bribery Act, Andrew’s breadth of experience and skill-set allows him to contextualise – and thereby humanise – the bald figures that underpin every fraud trial.
For over a decade, Andrew has represented practitioners before UKCP, BACP, HCPC, GMC, RCVS, SRA, BTAS and others.
It is this experience that has led him to contribute, together with Julie Norris of Kingsley Napley LLP, a chapter entitled ‘Reform’ in the ‘Psychotherapist & the Professional Complaint: the Shadow Side of Psychotherapy’ (Karnac 2022).
As an informed and passionate advocate, he believes that reform of this entire area of law is long overdue.
