CONTACT US
Drystone Chambers
35 Bedford Row
London
WC1R 4JH
DX: 332 London/Chancery Lane
Call 2013
Richard Davies
Call 2013
Richard Davies joined chambers in 2016. He accepts instructions in the fields of criminal law and regulatory law.
Prior to joining chambers, Richard studied in Maastricht as part of the Erasmus programme. He also worked in-house at a law firm in Vienna, Austria. He specialised in litigation and arbitration. His litigation work focused on cross-border disputes between Austrian entities and foreign companies as well as cases with associated white-collar crime proceedings. His arbitration experience has involved commercial, investment and sports law cases in both institutional and ad-hoc forums.
Richard has developed a broad criminal law and regulatory law practice. He is regularly instructed in crown court cases. He has dealt previously with matters, as defence trial counsel, for allegations such as inter alia murder (as a led junior), rape, sexual activity with a child, sexual assault, robbery, conspiracy to burgle, fraud, money laundering, conspiracy to supply drugs, as well as Section 18 and 20 GBH. He has acted as a led junior counsel and junior alone counsel. He has also obtained several certificates for counsel for youth court matters.
He prosecutes regulatory matters for local councils. He has also undertaken drafting and review work for the Financial Conduct Authority and the Home Office. He is direct access and CPS grade two qualified. In addition, he is approved onto the list of specialist regulatory advocates, Panel C, by the Health & Safety Executive. He has previously undertaken pro bono work for various charities relating to social security appeals, children’s rights and mental health law.
Richard has acted, as a led junior counsel, in several murder cases dealing with issues such as mental health conditions, forensics and cell site evidence.
R v DW – Oxford Crown Court
Defendant found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity. The case involved the killing of the defendant’s mother and extensive psychiatric evidence.
R v AM – Newport Crown Court
Successful application to dismiss for murder and GBH counts against the defendant. This case involved numerous defendants and alleged organised crime related to a cannabis factory.
Richard has completed the vulnerable witnesses training within the Inn of Court. He is familiar with the Ground Rules Hearing and Section 28 procedure. Richard is experienced in the field of appropriate questioning for witnesses of a certain age as well as those with special needs.
R v KC - Oxford Crown Court
Autistic defendant acquitted of one count of sexual assault against a co-worker. Intermediary used to assist the defendant.
R v SG - Lincoln Crown Court
Defendant acquitted on two counts of sexual assault and indecent exposure. Numerous Section 41, YJCE Act issues involved in the case.
R v RO - Oxford Crown Court
Successful defence of a man with learning difficulties charged with 15 counts of rape and serious sexual offences. Jury returned unanimous not guilty verdicts on all counts.
Richard is familiar with detailed evaluation of communication evidence in such cases. He is well versed in communicating with vulnerable defendants. Richard has analysed PACE and the police’s obligations therein.
R v GK – Central Criminal Court
Defendant acquitted of several firearms allegations as part of a four-handed trial lasting eight weeks. The case involved careful analysis of telephone and handwriting evidence.
R v JB – Wood Green Crown Court
Successful Section 78, PACE argument on the first day of a robbery trial to exclude the ID evidence in this alleged group robbery case. The crown subsequently offered no evidence.
Richard has experience of the evaluation of banking evidence. He has analysed the appropriate sentencing guidelines. Richard is aware of the different type of roles that individuals can allegedly hold in money laundering operations.
R v JC - Snaresbrook Crown Court
Successful defence of a woman in a case which involved six defendants. The case focussed on two groups who were alleged to have conspired to supply Class A drugs. Allegations were made that the lay client transferred thousands of pounds which were alleged to be proceeds of the drug trade. The trial included police surveillance, forensics and over 60,000 pages of telephone evidence. The jury deliberated for two days before returning a unanimous not guilty verdict.
R v ME – Isleworth Crown Court
Defendant acquitted of receiving and attempting to remove from the UK high value stolen laser scanners. The matter involved analysis of cell site data and device tracking data as well as obtaining evidence from North Africa
R v AC – Oxford Crown Court
Defendant acquitted of two alleged robberies following a three-handed trial. The case involved detailed comparison between witness statements and careful CCTV analysis.
R v AR – Croydon Crown Court
Defendant acquitted of one count of alleged involvement in the supply of 8kg of cocaine. The case involved the detailed evaluation of surveillance logs and the token system within the drug trade.
R v SK – Isleworth Crown Court
Defendant acquitted of alleged involvement in the supply of 1kg of cocaine and heroin. The case required legal argument on bad character evidence and consideration of the correct meaning of slang terms regarding drug transactions.
Richard regularly prosecutes matters for local authorities. He is familiar with the appropriate legislation for property licensing and maintenance issues. He has provided advice on the obtaining and presentation of evidence. Richard has given guidance on disclosure issues.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
CookieLawInfoConsent | 1 year | CookieYes sets this cookie to record the default button state of the corresponding category and the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_ga | 1 year 1 month 4 days | Google Analytics sets this cookie to calculate visitor, session and campaign data and track site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognise unique visitors. |
_ga_* | 1 year 1 month 4 days | Google Analytics sets this cookie to store and count page views. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
has_seen_loading | 1 day | Description is currently not available. |
Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio
Title | Type | CV |
---|
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)
Need more information about the above Barristers and Legal Expertise?
Talk to one of our clerks: 020 7404 1881